Bruce Lee: A Life (Review)

Originally published in the July-August 2018 issue of Film Comment

By R. Emmet Sweeney

Fast and Furious: The martial-arts star was a force unto himself and a pioneer of flexible fighting styles

Bruce Lee: A Life (By Matthew Polly, Simon & Schuster, $35)

A transcendent figure in the history of martial-arts and action movies, Bruce Lee was long overdue for a door-stopping biography. Matthew Polly has filled the void admirably with Bruce Lee: A Life, a meticulously researched tome that follows Lee’s days as a delinquent youth through his long climb to icon-hood and tragic, controversial death. With his feline athleticism and nerve-popping intensity, Lee was a transfixing presence who developed a polyglot type of screen fighting that remains the norm today (and was a major influence on MMA). Dismissive of traditional forms of kung fu, Lee instead borrowed from everyone, incorporating Wing Chun, fencing, and boxing–whatever looked good on film.

American-born but raised in Hong Kong, he spent his life pulling from (and oscillating between) Eastern and Western cultures. His dad was a star in the knockabout Chinese opera, but spent more time in opium dens than at home. Lee acted out in response, a kid brawler who pulled a knife on one of his teachers, proving more proficient at street fights (and cha-cha dancing–he was an HK champion) than homework. Eager to improve his fighting skills, he trained in Wing Chun, an obscure form of kung fu that emphasizes close-quarters combat. He was taught by Ip Man (currently being immortalized in an ongoing series of films starring Donnie Yen). Lee’s good looks and rebellious streak landed him roles in teen movies, but this nascent career was cut short when his parents, fed up with his near-criminal behavior, shipped him to stay with friends in San Francisco and Seattle.

Polly depicts Lee as fanatically determined to become a star and outshine his father. He was a health-food nut who trained nonstop, his body freakishly chiseled in an era when the John Wayne barrel-chested physique was considered the peak of masculinity. It was his quick-twitch physicality that attracted the attention of his kung fu students as well as studio executives. There are some fascinating tick-tock accounts of how Lee finally got his breakthrough role of Kato in The Green Hornet TV show (1966-67), and how impossible it was for Asians to get cast as anything other than manservants–eventually forcing him back East to make his breakthrough film The Big Boss (1971).

Through his many failures and late spectacular success, Lee continued to hone his martial art Jeet Kune Do, which rejects a totalizing system for a changeable one that adjusts to the fighter’s particular skills. He called it “the style of no style,” and it’s what made a Bruce Lee fight so unpredictable and thrilling. His sudden passing at age 32 spawned wild conspiracy theories that Polly studiously debunks, allowing Lee to emerge back from myth and into the reality of his extraordinary life.

THE MAN WHO SAW A GHOST: THE LIFE AND WORK OF HENRY FONDA

October 16, 2012

Screen Shot 2020-02-05 at 5.08.19 PM

Devin McKinney has written a biography of uncommon urgency and feeling, about a man not prone to either.  Henry Fonda’s performances and, the book suggests, his private life, were built on varieties of withholding. Fonda’s greatest performances are models of underplaying, using his middle-Western sincerity to mask the losses that fissured his characters, manifesting only as haunted stares.   McKinney’s The Man Who Saw A Ghost: The Life and Work of Henry Fonda traces the tragedies in turn that marked Fonda’s personal life, those which lined his face and lie hidden behind his icy blue eyes. McKinney draws broad conclusions from these traumas, finding constant echoes in Fonda’s screen roles, an occasionally problematic approach that tends to reduce collaborative film efforts to manifestations of Fonda’s personality. But McKinney is a seductive and patient writer, and whenever he focuses on the physical details of a Fonda performance, his various postures and gaits, it is a revelation of the actor’s craft, how Fonda positioned himself most often to disappear, whether by shading his face or turning his back. McKinney exalts him for this reserve and modesty, a reticence and chastened demeanor the author will trace back to the ghosts that populate Fonda’s past and present, the human wreckage he has left behind in his fabulously successful life. Of all the iconic Hollywood screen presences, McKinney argues, Fonda stands apart, a symbol not of American exceptionalism but of hesitation and regret for the country that could have been.

McKinney is up front about the intent of his biographical project. It is not a data dump, replete with detailed production histories on all of Fonda’s stage and screen ventures, but selective, with “many interesting data, anecdotes, postulates, and possibilities…left out because they contributed insufficiently to the whole.” It is a crafted, thematic work, and might disappoint those looking for a linear immersion into his life. McKinney is after something grander, to position Fonda as a divided, haunted figure, his best performances “animated by the dark energy of contradiction”. He goes on to describe the types that fuel this dark energy, the “satisfied man’s paranoia, the good man’s bad urge, the hero’s despairing shade, and the patriot’s doubting conscience.” McKinney will then pair these fictional shades with Fonda’s real life losses, which include a spate of suicides of loved ones, his four busted marriages, and most paramount for McKinney, his witnessing a lynching at the age of fourteen in Omaha, Nebraska (anticipating the scenes in Young Mr. Lincoln and The Ox Bow Incident). McKinney argues that these real-life events creep their way into his work, and that through his performances “the hidden becomes visible, specters are raised, and shadows begin to move on their own.”

There is a grandiloquent intensity to these early passages in the book, using a dualistic template (light/dark, hidden/visible) that treats Fonda more as myth and symbol than as a man.  McKinney is mythologizing Fonda as much as Fonda did with Lincoln, which made him wary to take on the part. To such mythologizing, John Ford, director of Young Mr. Lincoln, responded with (as McKinney quotes): “What the fuck is all this shit about you not wanting to play this picture? You think Lincoln’s a great fucking Emancipator, huh? He’s a young jack-legged lawyer from Springfield, for Christ sake.” Early on, McKinney seems to forget that Fonda is a jack-legged actor from Grand Island, Nebraska, and not only a fading symbol of a conflicted America. But the book has a flashback structure which fills in Fonda’s life, his jack-legged roots, in between analyses of the myths he was creating in his movies. Patience is required to recognize the edifice McKinney is constructing.

Even as the structure goes up, there is plenty to inspect, as McKinney digs into the features he considers central to his career. He is dazzling when describing Fonda’s meticulous performance, but perfunctory and vague with questions of film style, or how Fonda worked with his directors or fellow actors. Consider this stunning bit on Fonda’s turn in The Grapes of Wrath:

From the start, Fonda’s body stance is nervous but composed, tense and ready. Skinny body in its black suit with high-water cuffs, arms angled outward to stick hands in pockets, pelvis jutting slightly; lots of sunlight between the bony elbows and narrow hips. Watchful eyes in a rectangular head, topped by a huge cloth cap shadowing the eyes throughout the story.

This is a conjuring act, making Fonda’s awkwardly intense Tom Joad appear before your mind’s eye, and indicating how he creates the character through angled limbs and and that insouciantly rebellious “pelvis jutting slightly.” Compare that to his description of John Ford’s compositions:  “Ford is in complete command of his early scenes… He shoots in high-contrast light and rough-hewn settings, pruning Steinbeck’s flowers of prose to leave only stalk and stem.”  Later he will say  the movie “threatens to break down when overheated by bad acting or false framing” without elaborating upon what would make a framing “false”.  I had hoped for more detail of how Fonda worked with collaborators on set, but that is something in rich supply during his extended Broadway period, which pulled him away from Hollywood for a while with the smash hit Mister Roberts (1948,  made into a film in 1955).

It is a tragi-comic navy tale for which Fonda will wear his own Navy blues, having recently been demobilized after serving as an officer on the U.S.S. Curtiss during WWII, deployed in the Marshall Islands. Mister Roberts  ends with a devastating kamikaze attack, one which Fonda himself narrowly escaped during his years of enlistment. The show was a huge hit, but Fonda still played things great interiority and reserve. Director Joshua Logan said that Fonda, “always wanted  to face upstage. I had to use tricks to get him so the audience could see him work.” As Tom Joad shades his eyes, Roberts turns away, and, McKinney writes, “the audience is again left to feel what is hidden.”

As McKinney returns again and again to Fonda’s deflective, recessionary performance style, and outlines his similarly distant relationship to his wives and children (although despite a rocky relationship, Jane’s political misadventures eventually do turn him against the Vietnam War), his arguments gain heft and weight. Fonda commits stage suicide in A Gift of Time, “a private act of empathy and remembering” for his ex-wife, Frances, who took her own life. The deaths that had marked his life continue to enter his work, until even offstage, his body begins to erode, and Henry Fonda is as synonymous with America as Abraham Lincoln. That McKinney can make one weep for the loss of his talent makes it a powerful biography, but then cry again for the evanescence of what he used to represent – the memory of a dream of a just United States, makes it a work of art.